The rationale behind those policies can be applied by proposing the pure and simple return of emigrants or by establishing programmes through which these individuals could make a contribution to the society of origin.

The return can be voluntary, when the emigrant himself understands that the time has come to go back to his country, whatever the reasons may be. In other instances, coercion is at work, as is the case with repatriations. The latter situation is unpredictable since it may occur with irregular immigrants or with different types of refugees.

European countries applied important return programmes to recover a considerable portion of their population that emigrated to Latin America, but the context of that return was extremely beneficial for those emigrants, since they were returning to countries that had entered a phase of economic recovery and development far superior than that of any of the Latin American countries where they found themselves at that time. The return not only involved the satisfaction of reuniting families, but also an environment of political stability, as well as the possibility of sound employment, adequate social security and a set of benefits that the so-called patrimonialist State usually offered citizens.

Another example of massive repatriation occurred in Central America . There, hostile conflicts (during the 70’s) propelled the relocation of thousands upon thousands of people. Within those great migrations of people were persecuted politicians or economic emigrants equally affected by the hostile conflicts. At a certain time, once peace agreements had been reached, these same individuals were the target of return campaigns. However, that process did not enjoy the same successes as the European one, since the emigrants were not returning to their countries under the same conditions as the Europeans did. That explains the surge of a second migratory wave, carried out by the same individuals who fled from the effects of the hostile conflicts, only this time the emigrants left the countries of the Central American isthmus and moved toward the United States of America and Europe .

These examples show us that to ensure a return policy with sound results, it is essential that emigrants have, in their countries, better conditions than those that motivated them to leave in the first place. This is the dilemma that we the generating countries have to face: how to recover our best talents, without first changing the socioeconomic reality.

Dr. Rubén Silié Valdez is the Secretary General of the Association of Caribbean States. The opinions expressed are not necessarily the official views of the ACS. Comments and reactions can be sent to mail@acs-aec.org

June 1, 2006