AIDS, ANTHRAX AND THE WTOThe Greater Caribbean This Week Norman Girvan One
result of the WTO Ministerial Conference in Doha was a declaration on
Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and Public Health. The
Declaration could have great significance for the Greater Caribbean in its
fight against AIDS and other epidemic diseases. Consider the experience of
AIDS vs. Anthrax in terms of the impact of TRIPS on the public health
response. The TRIPS Treaty of 1994 forms part
of the agreement setting up the WTO. One effect is to oblige developing
countries to respect patents held by transnational companies, while
allowing for special exemptions in cases of emergency. South Africa has been arguing that
it has an AIDS emergency. Some 5.3 million people are HIV positive, over 10 percent of the population. In
sub-Saharan Africa as a whole, 25 million people are infected. Patented drugs are available to
slow the advance of AIDS, at a cost to the individual patient of
US$10,000-$15,000 per year. Cheaper generic substitutes can be
manufactured at one-hundredth of the cost. So the South African government passed a law in 1997
to allow the cheaper drugs to be imported and/or manufactured. Its
legality was immediately challenged by 39 international drug companies,
citing the TRIPS agreement. In April 2001, after a huge campaign mounted by the
South African government, AIDS activists and NGOs, the drug companies
withdrew their opposition to the Act.
Time elapsed: four years. AIDS-related deaths in South Africa are
estimated at 139,000 per year. It took less than one month after the emergence of the
recent anthrax scare in the U.S. for the manufacturer of Cipro, the
leading antidote, to agree to halve its price to the government in the
interest of public health. Canada went further and licensed the
manufacture of a generic substitute, effectively suspending the Cipro
patent on the grounds of a national health emergency. No one has legally
contested the Canadian action. So far there have been five confirmed deaths from
anthrax in the US and none in Canada. >Double standards, or differential application? The
Doha declaration on TRIPS and Public Health marks a significant advance by
way of clarification. It states that each WTO member has the right to
grant compulsory licenses (which allow generics to be manufactured), the
freedom to determine the grounds upon which such licences are granted, and
the right to determine what constitutes a national emergency, “it being
understood that that public health crises, including those relating to
HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria and other epidemics, can represent a
national emergency or other circumstances of extreme urgency”. The Caribbean sub-region (independent islands, Guyana,
Suriname and Belize) has the highest incidence of AIDS after sub-Saharan
Africa. Of 34 million people, 460,000 are believed to be infected.
But most countries lack the manufacturing capabilities
in pharmaceuticals that are needed to make effective use of compulsory
licensing. They would need to engage in “parallel importing” perhaps
making special arrangements with suppliers in countries like India and
Cuba, which have technological capabilities in this area. The Doha Declaration recognizes that most developing
countries face this problem. It instructs the TRIPS Council to find an
expeditious solution and to report to the WTO General Council on the
matter by the end of 2002. If the Greater Caribbean wants to use the Declaration to help strengthen its campaign against AIDS and other epidemic diseases, it will need strong representation in the TRIPS Council in the coming months. (Ends)
Prof. Norman Girvan is Secretary General of the Association of Caribbean States. The views expressed are not necessarily the official views of the ACS. November 29, 2001 |