MULTIDIMENSIONAL VS. MILITARY SECURITYThe Greater Caribbean This Week Norman Girvan If the 32nd OAS General Assembly that wound up last week achieved only one thing, it was to shift the terms of the discourse on security from a military to a multi-dimensional perspective. The atrocities of 9/11 had produced an understandable obsession with preventing future acts of a similar kind. Initial reliance has been on military action, enhanced security procedures and the targeting of terrorists and terrorist groups. |
||||
|
Recent
statements by Amnesty International and by the UN Commissioner on Human
Rights have raised concerns that the one-sided pursuit of security is
in danger of being carried out at the expense of fundamental human rights
and the international rule of law. The
Inter-American Convention on Terrorism adopted at the OAS General Assembly
tends to reflect the dominant perspective on fighting terrorism. Its
first three substantive articles are aimed at limiting money-laundering
and the financing of terrorist groups. Others cover cooperation on border
controls and among law enforcement authorities, mutual legal assistance,
the transfer of persons in custody, the inapplicability of political
offence exception, the denial of refugee status and the denial of asylum
to alleged terrorists But
the exchanges among Foreign Ministers and the final Assembly Declaration
on terrorism had a noticeably different emphasis. The tone was set by
Prime Minister Arthur of Barbados in his opening address. He
asserted that a meaningful definition of security cannot be limited
to traditional military operations, but must adopt an integrated approach
that addresses the conditions creating social instability such as HIV/AIDS,
illegal arms and drug trafficking, trans-national crime, ecological
disasters and the poverty that afflicts some 170 million people in the
hemisphere. The
multi-dimensional approach was the official theme of the 32nd General
Assembly. Its basis was set out in a submission by the Barbados delegation
which suggested that there is "an inextricable link between economic
disenfranchisement, poverty, conflict, apathy and (the) disillusionment
of our citizens" that when combined produce "the root causes
of terrorism". This argument elicited a dissenting comment from
the United States delegation. The
Barbados paper elaborated on the contributory factors to terrorism referred
to by its Prime Minister. It called for the refinement of existing mechanisms
that deal with these problems, as well as for new and innovative solutions. This
approach was supported by several other delegations. Several speakers
pointed out that protectionist measures in the steel and agricultural
sectors by the hemisphere's largest economy will have the effect of
increasing economic insecurity in other countries in the region. The
Declaration of Bridgetown adopted by the meeting officially endorses
the multi-dimensional approach. It agrees that the security of the hemisphere
encompasses political, economic, social, health, and environmental factors
and that multidimensional security should be a topic on the agenda of
the Special OAS Conference on Security set for Mexico in 2003, when
the issues will be revisited in greater depth. Held
in one of the hemisphere's smallest countries, the OAS meeting provided
convincing evidence that small can not only be beautiful, but can also
provide leadership and be extraordinarily efficient in organizing international
events. Delegates
heaped praise on the host country for its hospitality, the meticulously
made arrangements and the skill of the Conference Chairman, Barbados's
Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ms. Billie Miller. Like
Costa Rica, which successfully hosted the 31st General Assembly in 2001,
Barbados did the Greater Caribbean proud.
Professor
Norman Girvan is Secretary General of the Association of Caribbean States.
The views expressed are not necessarily the official views of the ACS.
Feedback can be sent to mail@acs-aec.org. (ends) June 7, 2002 |
|
|
Association of Caribbean States ©
2007 |